<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Andrei Stoleru - personal blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoleru.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoleru.com</link>
	<description>Fingerstyle coding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:51:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Two W3C articles translated in Romanian</title>
		<link>http://www.stoleru.com/two-w3c-articles-translated-in-romanian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stoleru.com/two-w3c-articles-translated-in-romanian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrei STOLERU</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoleru.com/?p=109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I&#8217;ve translated 2 articles from the W3C into Romanian. Both articles keep the same formatting and the full copyright belongs to its authors/editors. Original article: http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/REC-css3-color-20110607/ Romanian version: http://www.stoleru.com/w3c/CSS Color Module Level 3.htm &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212; Original article: http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/REC-css3-namespace-20110929/ Romanian version: http://www.stoleru.com/w3c/CSS Namespaces Module.htm &#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I&#8217;ve translated 2 articles from the <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-all#tr_REC">W3C </a> into Romanian.</p>
<p>Both articles keep the same formatting and the full copyright belongs to its authors/editors.</p>
<p>Original article: <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/REC-css3-selectors-20110929/"><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/REC-css3-color-20110607/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/REC-css3-color-20110607/</a></a></p>
<p>Romanian version: <a href="http://www.stoleru.com/w3c/CSS%20Color%20Module%20Level%203.htm">http://www.stoleru.com/w3c/CSS Color Module Level 3.htm</a></p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Original article: <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/REC-css3-selectors-20110929/"></a><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/REC-css3-color-20110607/"><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/REC-css3-namespace-20110929/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/REC-css3-namespace-20110929/</a></a></p>
<p>Romanian version: <a href="http://www.stoleru.com/w3c/CSS Namespaces Module.htm">http://www.stoleru.com/w3c/CSS Namespaces Module.htm</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stoleru.com/two-w3c-articles-translated-in-romanian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looking for the older versions of PrestaShop?</title>
		<link>http://www.stoleru.com/looking-for-the-older-versions-of-prestashop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stoleru.com/looking-for-the-older-versions-of-prestashop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrei STOLERU</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[module]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[older]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prestashp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[versions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoleru.com/?p=97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PrestaShop current version is 1.4.3, but what if you need to make a module compatible with older versions of PS?  Than the solution is simple. Go over Google Code and download which version you want from their repository. Don&#8217;t even bother to search on the PrestaShop website.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PrestaShop current version is 1.4.3, but what if you need to make a module compatible with older versions of PS?  Than the solution is simple. Go over <a title="PrestaShop older versions" href="http://code.google.com/p/prestashop/downloads/list" target="_blank">Google Code</a> and download which version you want from their repository. Don&#8217;t even bother to search on the PrestaShop website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stoleru.com/looking-for-the-older-versions-of-prestashop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One of the best IE6 stories</title>
		<link>http://www.stoleru.com/one-of-the-best-ie6-stories/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stoleru.com/one-of-the-best-ie6-stories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 13:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrei STOLERU</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoleru.com/?p=69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out this post: Farewell IE6 , it&#8217;s one of the best I ever read about IE6. I have also the same feeling regarding IE6. I&#8217;m a little nostalgic because I really started to get along with it, but I&#8217;m glad that we (UI developers) don&#8217;t have to test our work on IE6 anymore.  Long [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out this post: <a title="IE6 Story" href="http://sixrevisions.com/web-development/farewell-ie6/" target="_blank">Farewell IE6</a> , it&#8217;s one of the best I ever read about IE6.</p>
<p>I have also the same feeling regarding IE6. I&#8217;m a little nostalgic because I really started to get along with it, but I&#8217;m glad that we (UI developers) don&#8217;t have to test our work on IE6 anymore.  Long live HTML5 &amp; CSS3 compatible browsers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stoleru.com/one-of-the-best-ie6-stories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IE8 bug: PNG display with strange gradient</title>
		<link>http://www.stoleru.com/ie8-bug-png-display-with-strange-gradient/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stoleru.com/ie8-bug-png-display-with-strange-gradient/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrei STOLERU</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CSS Bugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoleru.com/?p=57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I had a problem with a background image that it was displayed with a strange gradient that fades in the right-bottom corner of the container. Problem: If you are using a semi-transparent PNG (1 x 1 px) as a background-image with repeat, and Internet Explorer is displaying a strange graphic instead of a nice and consistent background, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I had a problem with a background image that it was displayed with a strange gradient that fades in the right-bottom corner of the container.</p>
<p><strong>Problem:</strong> If you are using a semi-transparent PNG (1 x 1 px) as a background-image with repeat, and Internet Explorer is displaying a strange graphic instead of a nice and consistent background, than you have to apply the next solution.</p>
<p><strong>Solution:</strong> A very simple solution is to increase the size of the PNG to a minimum of 10 x 10 px. IE image render engine kind of sucks when it&#8217;s about rendering a small semi-transparent PNG on a big surface.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stoleru.com/ie8-bug-png-display-with-strange-gradient/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

